It’s one thing to discuss. My points of view don’t make any personal attacks but just discuss the issue and my points of view.
I provide reasons, data and research for my arguments. I bother taking the time to do the necessary background reading to ensure I at least have an educated opinion and even research the counter arguments.
But saying things to me that I’m playing with words has a very negative connotation. I would ask you again if you understand how that looks. For context, choice of the right words are important. You can look at how the [Suggestion] Firo coins redenomination proposal because of an initially badly worded title that said change supply resulted in lots of gut reactions. You can read through that thread and see how people didn’t understand things.
Or suggesting that I’m ruining the project by initiating proposals which I didn’t start truly frustrates me. That Bitcoin can do no wrong because it’s number one and that we are a “long term failed project” makes me wonder why we are even trying.
I’m fedup of being everyone’s scapegoat and already stepping back. I’m fedup of trying really hard to make Firo work while being mindful of community sentiment, being blamed for the project’s failures and yet expected to continue working.