As I mentioned on the CFC post I speak what I see and will always be true to it.
After reading the post it makes me wonder then what’s the point of rearranging the % of rewards if then we are suggesting to do accelerated token emission?
So we are starting a poll on the basis the miners are selling but then we are doing another exercise to give it back to them 
As a long (not just supporter) but actually someone with a huge skin in the project over the years have seen all sorts of ideas but none have worked (in terms of price) because that’s what even the mention ones above are. Trying to sustain the project but also see a price increase (because that’s what will sustain in). In fact over the years we are getting further down the rabbit hole.
It’s clear to me that the only thing that all the proposals we have done have benefitted only the dev team (e.i. keep getting salary) and the people that are in and out. I am yet to see any proposal or work that’s been done to benefit people like myself that’s been holding on for years or people that buy and have decided to hold. For anyone thinking of jumping in and trying to tell me it’s my fault or I was stupid that I bought high, don’t. Because at one point Bitcoin was $50, Ethereum was $50, Monero was $50, etc… if you will say Firo is none of the above projects then you are practically saying Firo is not a good project.
I also never understood why the only important thing we have is the development and all resources being funnelled to that channel only. 6 years down the road and yes we may have tech progress but nothing else to show for it. In fact we develop then Monero (and many other projects) copy and we can see progress on their end.
It’s finally time to realise that the issue is not with the miners, not with MN but with us as a project. We are failing to catch people imagination and also failing to make people believe in the project.
What I also thing is time to is really give voice to people that have a skin in the project and not just anyone. Maybe for that we should look into Dash. Why should the decision be open to people that don’t hold Firo, barely have any Firo or a just here today and gone tomorrow.
It’s time to start incentivising also people that have been with the project for years and are holding thru thick and thin.
We also must realise that development is important and expensive but marketing (which leads to adoption) is just as important and as expensive if not even more expensive.
Back in the days we were everywhere. Attending meetings, gatherings, conferences, etc… now we are nowhere but few little interviews.
I can go on for days but will end with we must see a change before is too late. A change that doesn’t constantly evolves around tech or another proposal.
It’s been done so many times so let’s try looking at other direction along side the above two.