From my point of view, this is the best compromise for the moment.
If you want to know the whole argument to arrive at this compromise, I tried to explain it in the topic where we exchanged on the best possible block-reward distribution (https://forum.firo.org/t/tokenomics-and-funding-division-of-block-reward-discussion-and-community-matching-fund/2061/379).
Unfortunately, Reuben forgot to propose this distribution in the vote (he apologized).
From the beginng of this pool, the winning votet is the 15/60/10/15 split. This vote takes up the most important (allocating 60% of the block-reward to thoses who support the price of FIRO by buying FIRO on the exchanges and not reselling them). The only difference (with the 20/60/5/15 distribution) is a personal choice between the allocation of 5% of the block-reward between miners (15% vs. 20%) and community fund (10% vs. 5%).
The end of PoW on ETH will blow up the GPU mining world. There is going to be so much hashing power available and so few valuable coins to mine, that FIRO will definitely continue to attract miners with 20% of the block-reward, and probably even 15% (especially if the allocation of 60% of the boc-reward to the masternodes makes it possible to raise the price of FIRO). As a reminder, miners also receive transaction fees.
There remains the question of the community fund: it all depends on how it will be managed: it may be in vain or on the contrary very beneficial. We have to choose between assigning it 5 or 10%…
Remark:
Today, animation actions around FIRO are financed by the dev-fund. By creating a community fund, we relieve the dev-fund of these expenses. So, even keeping the dev-fund at 15% of the block-reward, the creation of the community fund amounts to increasing the resources devoted to the dev-fund.