# FCS Proposal - Spark Audit Data Proposal

**URL:** <https://forum.firo.org/t/fcs-proposal-spark-audit-data-proposal/4394>\
**Category:** fcs-proposals\
**Created:** [October 6, 2026, 4:29pm UTC](https://forum.firo.org/t/fcs-proposal-spark-audit-data-proposal/4394 "2026-10-06T16:29:09Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 6\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![fcs](https://forum.firo.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/f/4bbf92/32.png) [@fcs](https://forum.firo.org/u/fcs)\
**Post date:** [October 6, 2026, 4:29pm UTC](https://forum.firo.org/t/fcs-proposal-spark-audit-data-proposal/4394/1 "2026-10-06T16:29:09Z")

</div>

A new proposal has been posted to the Firo Crowdfunding System.

- Title: Spark Audit Data Proposal
- Author: nexusocean
- Proposal type: Core
- Link: [click here](http://funding.firo.org/proposals/spark-audit-data-proposal-nexusocean)

Use this topic to discuss this proposal!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AJaydono](https://forum.firo.org/user_avatar/forum.firo.org/ajaydono/32/155_2.png) [@AJaydono](https://forum.firo.org/u/AJaydono)\
**Post date:** [October 7, 2026, 7:14pm UTC](https://forum.firo.org/t/fcs-proposal-spark-audit-data-proposal/4394/2 "2026-10-07T19:14:25Z")

</div>

**Discussion log** [Telegram: View @firocfc](https://t.me/firocfc/6068)

[10/7/2026 12:13 PM] Nrsimha in reply to AJay:  
I vote: **Nay**  
Reason: many possible issues of tracing connections of wallets will be mitigated by upcoming “Spark Coinbase” ([Roadmap | Firo - Privacy-preserving cryptocurrency](https://firo.org/about/roadmap/)), rest is caused by lazyness and carelessnes together with using transparent address (e.g. same high value transactions, withdrav 2350 Firo from exchange → spark → transparent 2349.99999)

[10/7/2026 12:29 PM] Rottenero in reply to AJay: **Nay** from me, I’m afraid.

[10/7/2026 3:24 PM] Antibit in reply to AJay: I completely agree with Nrsimha. **No** , unfortunately

[10/7/2026 7:25 PM] Алексей Васильев in reply to AJay:Within the project’s current paradigm, I do not consider a third-party audit to be a matter for the CFC. Should the project launch on the market, announce an IPO, or undertake other investment-attraction activities, the question of an audit would likewise fall outside the scope of CFC’s decision-making.  
I also agree with Nrsimha’s opinion.  
My vote is **no**.

[10/7/2026 7:46 PM] Antibit: We rejected this proposal by a majority

[10/7/2026 9:44 PM] Thorfried in reply to AJay: Hello, just for the record I would like my vote recorded as a “ **yay** ”. This is what I committed to in my post in the forum.  
I also think that this was a great initiative on the part of the applicant. Certainly I can see the benefit to the community of an “idiots guide” on how to not get spotted using Firo. I know it would be of use to yours truly!  
I wish him good luck with his MSc and hope that he will stay engaged with the Firofam

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AJaydono](https://forum.firo.org/user_avatar/forum.firo.org/ajaydono/32/155_2.png) [@AJaydono](https://forum.firo.org/u/AJaydono)\
**Post date:** [October 9, 2026, 3:07am UTC](https://forum.firo.org/t/fcs-proposal-spark-audit-data-proposal/4394/3 "2026-10-09T03:07:46Z")

</div>

[10/9/2026 10:25 AM] Jagmo in reply to Nrsimha:

> ‎⁨I vote: Nay Reason: many possible issues of tracing…

Does it make sense to ask them to do the audit after the Spark Coinbase release?

[10/9/2026 10:26 AM] Jagmo: My thinking is that the audit is not very expensive, it might give everyone some insight or understanding that is worth it.

[10/10/2026 4:28 AM] Jagmo in reply to AJay:  
I will vote No on this one with the caveat that I am potentially interested in this audit in the future.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AJaydono](https://forum.firo.org/user_avatar/forum.firo.org/ajaydono/32/155_2.png) [@AJaydono](https://forum.firo.org/u/AJaydono)\
**Post date:** [October 9, 2026, 3:27am UTC](https://forum.firo.org/t/fcs-proposal-spark-audit-data-proposal/4394/4 "2026-10-09T03:27:46Z")

</div>

💡 Update on Spark Audit Data Proposal by nexusocean (@zeroXvinny)

5 of the 7 CFC members has voted on this proposal while the remaining has yet to vote or voice their opinion.

Given that a majority has voted Nay for this proposal, it has been Denied ❌

✅Yes/Yay  
@Thorfried

❌No/Nay  
@Nrsimha  
@rottenero  
@firofan  
@vaselexa  
@jagmot

🔄Not yet voted  
@ddadybayo

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![fcs](https://forum.firo.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/f/4bbf92/32.png) [@fcs](https://forum.firo.org/u/fcs)\
**Post date:** [October 9, 2026, 3:29am UTC](https://forum.firo.org/t/fcs-proposal-spark-audit-data-proposal/4394/5 "2026-10-09T03:29:18Z")

</div>

Status changed from ‘idea’ to ‘Disabled’

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![fcs](https://forum.firo.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/f/4bbf92/32.png) [@fcs](https://forum.firo.org/u/fcs)\
**Post date:** [October 19, 2026, 11:06am UTC](https://forum.firo.org/t/fcs-proposal-spark-audit-data-proposal/4394/6 "2026-10-19T11:06:31Z")

</div>

Status changed from ‘Disabled’ to ‘Funding Required’
